Techno Specs Gadget, Samsung Galaxy, New IMEI, Octopus Box Samsung, Android Jelly Bean, Ulefone Tiger, Chinese Miracle

Selasa, 11 Oktober 2016

General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements

General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements - are you surfing on google and finding this blog Techno Specs Gadget ?.. if yes, congratulations you will get updated information about General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements we have collected a lot of information from various reliable sources to make this article, so make sure you read through to finish, please see.

Articles : General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements
full Link : General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements
Article body-builder, Article General Court, Article shape mark, Article Universal Protein Supplements Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office Case T-335/15,

You can also see our article on:


General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements

The body-builder silhouette
Can “a silhouette, represented in black, of a person adopting a typical body-building pose displaying the muscles of his body” be registered as a trade mark for – among other things – nutritional supplements, clothing, and footwear?

As Katfriend Nedim Malovic (@malovicSE) explains, this very question has been recently addressed by the General Court.

Here’s what Nedim writes:

“In its judgmenton 29 September 2016 (Universal Protein Supplements Corp v European Union Intellectual Property Office Case, T-335/15, EU:T:2016:579) the General Court upheld the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) concerning an application to register a figurative sign representing a body-builder as a EU trade mark for the following classes of goods and services, and descriptions:

      Class 5: ‘Nutritional supplements’;
Class 25: ‘Clothing; footwear’;
Class 35: ‘On-line retail store services featuring nutritional supplements; health and diet-related products; clothing and footwear’.

Background

In 2014 the applicant, Universal Protein Supplements Corp, filed an application with the EUIPO to have the EU territory designed in respect of the international registration of a figurative sign representing a body-builder. The application was for goods and services in the classes indicated above.

The EUIPO examiner rejected the application, on grounds that the mark lacked any distinctive character and was descriptive for the purpose of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the (now) European Union Trade Mark (EUTMR).

In late 2014 Universal Protein appealed the examiner’s decision.

The EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal in March 2015. It held that the message conveyed by the sign related to ‘body-building’ or a ‘body-builder’ and that the relevant public would perceive a direct and specific link between the sign and the goods and services designated by the mark applied for.

The Board of Appeal concluded that such mark fell within the prohibition laid down in Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR. Furthermore, the mark was devoid of any distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7(1) (b) EUTMR, on the ground that it merely consisted of a representation of a body-builder, which would not enable the relevant public to perceive it as an indication of the commercial origin of the goods and services in question. 

Universal Protein did not however lose hope, and decided to appeal the decision before the General Court.  It claimed that: (i) the Fifth Board of Appeal had failed to consider the mark as a whole; (ii) that its own image of the body-builder has several meanings and conveys a message that goes beyond that of a ‘body-builder’ or ‘body-building’, and (iii) that securing registration would not impair the public interest aim that descriptive signs are not monopolised by economic operators.  

The National Lottery silhouette
Analysis

The General court began by examining whether Universal Protein’s mark should be considered descriptive.  

Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR pursues a public interest aim. Referring to Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol, the court recalled that a sign that is descriptive of the characteristics of the relevant goods or services ought to be freely available for use. In addition, a sign of this kind fails to fulfil the essential function of a trade mark, ie to identify the commercial origin of one’s own goods or services.

The General Court then stated that the descriptive nature of a sign is only to be assessed, (1) by reference to the way in which it is perceived by the relevant public, and (2) by reference to the goods or services concerned:

(1) Having regard to the relevant goods and services (nutritional supplements, clothing, footwear and online retail services relating to those goods) and considering that the mark is strictly figurative and lacks any verbal element, the average consumer – obviously reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect – is the public of the entire European Union. This said, because the sign consists of a typical body-builder, displaying the muscles of his body, represented in black silhouette, the message conveyed by that sign would relate to body-building.

(2) The chosen goods and services in Classes 5 (nutritional supplements), 25 (clothing; footwear), and 35 (online retail store services featuring nutritional supplements; health and diet-related products; clothing and shoes), are all indicative that the mark applied for has a sufficiently direct and specific link with nutritional supplements, clothing, footwear, and online retail store services of those goods and goods related to health and diet. According to the court, even if the categories of goods and services at issue were to also include services with no link to body-building and that, accordingly, the sign at issue were not descriptive of all the goods and services in those categories, the applicant had applied for the registration of the sign at issue for each of these as a whole without making any distinction. Accordingly, the body-builder sign would fall within the prohibition set by Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR.

Contrary to the applicant’s claims, the court found that the alleged aesthetic character of the stylised image does not require any mental effort on behalf of the relevant public. The meaning of the sign at issue (which refers to the concept of ‘body-builder’ or ‘body-building’) is immediately clear.  By referring to earlier case law, the court added that, even assuming that a sign has several meanings, if at least one of the meanings designates a characteristic of the goods concerned, then that sign must be equally refused.

Merpel's silhouette
The applicant’s further claim that there would be no general interest in requiring that a representation such as that in the present case be available because there are practically unlimited ways of depicting body-builders was regarded as irrelevant. In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. 

The Board of Appeal was therefore correct in concluding that the sign in question is descriptive for the purpose of Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR.

All this said, the court considered unnecessary to review whether the sign at issue would be distinctive, and concluded that the body-builder silhouette could not be registered as a trade mark because of the prohibition in Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR.

Conclusion


This decision appears correct from a formal standpoint, and probably the General Court was concerned with the implications of creating a monopoly over the use of a silhouette of this kind for such types of goods and services. However, in the past there have been decisions that could have supported a different outcome. For instance, it is unclear why the silhouette of a body-builder should be descriptive of nutritional supplements, while a hand with a smile and crossed fingers should not suggest “best of luck” and describe what the concept of lottery is all about. Yet, the National Lottery ‘hand’ was successfully registered as a EU trade mark.”



information about General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements has been completed in the discussion

hopefully the information General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements that we provide can provide benefits for you in finding the information you need

you have finished reading the article about General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements if you want to bookmark or also want to share this information to many people can use the link http://belialslut.blogspot.com/2016/10/general-court-confirms-that-body.html ok so and thank you.

Tag : , , , ,
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+

Related : General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplements

11 komentar:

  1. There has been a series of compaints about vape shops nowadays, especially online vape shops carrying not only Nicotine vapes but THC products, THC vapes and CBD products as well.

    BalasHapus
  2. We are a third-party service provider that offers services for dating, streaming issues, technical issues, and many more. If you face any kind of trouble with any of the mentioned services please contact us or visit our website.
    TV Stream Helpline
    POF Support Phone Number

    BalasHapus
  3. Amazon Prime is best in class video streaming service. If the truth to be told, video streaming is just one benefit of many that one can gain by subscribing the Amazon Prime subscription. But, what if you have to cancel Amazon subscription? Worry not. Subscribers are not bound to continue to get along with Amazon Prime subscription. Users are allowed to cancel their Amazon subscription with ease of mind. You can get either partial or full Amazon refund in two cases. Open the given link to know everything that you need about Amazon Prime cancelation and refund.

    BalasHapus
  4. SevenSolver is a complete service IT company with a wide range of services. We provide the best agile, end-to-end and good quality product to you. https://sevensolver.com/

    BalasHapus
  5. Choosing the right payment app for kids is very important. While picking up the best money transfer app, parents need to make sure that the payment app is safe, secure, and user-friendly. Also, it must be widely accepted for hassle-free payment experience. If this is the criteria for choosing a payment app for your kids, you might like to choose Cash App. But, the million dollar question is: Is Cash App Card for minors available? Answer is No. According to Cash App policy, kids and minors below 18 can't use Cash App card. However, if parents wish, they can allow their children to use their own Cash App card for hassle-free payments.

    BalasHapus
  6. Are you one of those users who are looking forward to understating How Cash App Twitch works? Besides, if you are also seeking more details regarding the same, you will need to get in touch with the ingenious Cash App support geeks whenever you want and receive the one-stop solutions.

    BalasHapus
  7. How Do You Call Facebook About A Problem You Encounter With Password?
    Have you lost or forgotten your Facebook account password due to a wide variety of known and unknown reasons? In such a critical situation, you should consider getting in touch with seasoned Facebook professional who will assist you to deal with all such hurdles within the least time frame. Apart from that, you have to go to Facebook help center to understand How Do You Call Facebook about A Problem in a proper manner.

    BalasHapus
  8. What can the HP solution center help you with?
    HP solution center is a general printer management program which is simply designed for the printers which were manufactured before the year 2010. It is important to note that HP solution center does not not work when the Flash software is not active on the system on which it is installed. Recently, since flash is not supported by the industry, HP solution center is also no longer supported.

    BalasHapus
  9. Renovation Contractor Toronto-Great6.ca
    Find the best renovation contractor Toronto for all your home renovation needs. Our experienced team of professionals offers quality workmanship, superior customer service, and competitive rates. Get the job done right, with us!

    BalasHapus
  10. All of the most recent movies, web series, and songs are available for download and viewing on the Tamilplay website.
    Tamilplay

    BalasHapus